research_1744982496.json 78 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468
  1. {
  2. "research_intent": "人工智能在医疗诊断中的应用",
  3. "timestamp": 1744982201.989553,
  4. "language": "zh",
  5. "english_keywords": [
  6. "artificial intelligence",
  7. "medical diagnosis",
  8. "machine learning",
  9. "healthcare",
  10. "deep learning",
  11. "clinical decision support",
  12. "diagnostic accuracy",
  13. "AI algorithms"
  14. ],
  15. "original_keywords": [
  16. "人工智能,医学诊断,机器学习,医疗保健,深度学习,临床决策支持,诊断准确性,AI算法"
  17. ],
  18. "english_directions": [
  19. "How can deep learning models be optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection using multimodal medical imaging?",
  20. "What are the limitations and biases of current AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems, and how can they be mitigated to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes?",
  21. "How can federated learning frameworks enhance the development of machine learning models for medical diagnosis while preserving patient data privacy across institutions?",
  22. "What is the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data?",
  23. "How can explainable AI (XAI) techniques be integrated into deep learning-based diagnostic tools to improve clinician trust and adoption in real-world healthcare settings?",
  24. "What role can reinforcement learning play in dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems for personalized treatment recommendations in chronic disease management?"
  25. ],
  26. "original_directions": [
  27. "如何优化深度学习模型以利用多模态医学影像提高早期癌症诊断的准确性?",
  28. "当前临床决策支持系统中的人工智能算法存在哪些局限性和偏见,如何通过 mitigation 策略确保医疗结果的公平性?",
  29. "联邦学习框架如何在保护跨机构患者数据隐私的同时,促进医学诊断机器学习模型的开发?",
  30. "在电子健康记录(EHR)数据中,集成机器学习方法与单一模型方法相比,对提高罕见疾病诊断准确性的相对效果如何?",
  31. "如何将可解释人工智能(XAI)技术整合到基于深度学习的诊断工具中,以提升临床医生的信任度并促进其在真实医疗场景中的应用?",
  32. "强化学习在动态优化临床决策支持系统、为慢性病管理提供个性化治疗建议方面可以发挥什么作用?"
  33. ],
  34. "papers_by_direction": [
  35. {
  36. "direction": "How can deep learning models be optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection using multimodal medical imaging?",
  37. "original_direction": "如何优化深度学习模型以利用多模态医学影像提高早期癌症诊断的准确性?",
  38. "papers": [
  39. {
  40. "id": "2407.01869v2",
  41. "title": "Let it shine: Autofluorescence of Papanicolaou-stain improves AI-based cytological oral cancer detection",
  42. "authors": [
  43. "Wenyi Lian",
  44. "Joakim Lindblad",
  45. "Christina Runow Stark",
  46. "Jan-Michaél Hirsch",
  47. "Nataša Sladoje"
  48. ],
  49. "summary": "Oral cancer is a global health challenge. It is treatable if detected early,\nbut it is often fatal in late stages. There is a shift from the invasive and\ntime-consuming tissue sampling and histological examination, toward\nnon-invasive brush biopsies and cytological examination. Reliable\ncomputer-assisted methods are essential for cost-effective and accurate\ncytological analysis, but the lack of detailed cell-level annotations impairs\nmodel effectiveness. This study aims to improve AI-based oral cancer detection\nusing multimodal imaging and deep fusion. We combine brightfield and\nfluorescence whole slide microscopy imaging to analyze Papanicolaou-stained\nliquid-based cytology slides of brush biopsies collected from both healthy and\ncancer patients. Due to limited cytological annotations, we utilize a weakly\nsupervised deep learning approach using only patient-level labels. We evaluate\nvarious multimodal fusion strategies, including early, late, and three recent\nintermediate fusion methods. Our results show: (i) fluorescence imaging of\nPapanicolaou-stained samples provides substantial diagnostic information; (ii)\nmultimodal fusion enhances classification and cancer detection accuracy over\nsingle-modality methods. Intermediate fusion is the leading method among the\nstudied approaches. Specifically, the Co-Attention Fusion Network (CAFNet)\nmodel excels with an F1 score of 83.34% and accuracy of 91.79%, surpassing\nhuman performance on the task. Additional tests highlight the need for precise\nimage registration to optimize multimodal analysis benefits. This study\nadvances cytopathology by combining deep learning and multimodal imaging to\nenhance early, non-invasive detection of oral cancer, improving diagnostic\naccuracy and streamlining clinical workflows. The developed pipeline is also\napplicable in other cytological settings. Our codes and dataset are available\nonline for further research.",
  50. "published": "2024-07-02T01:05:35+00:00",
  51. "updated": "2024-10-27T16:58:38+00:00",
  52. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.01869v2",
  53. "source": "arxiv"
  54. },
  55. {
  56. "id": "2312.01573v1",
  57. "title": "Survey on deep learning in multimodal medical imaging for cancer detection",
  58. "authors": [
  59. "Yan Tian",
  60. "Zhaocheng Xu",
  61. "Yujun Ma",
  62. "Weiping Ding",
  63. "Ruili Wang",
  64. "Zhihong Gao",
  65. "Guohua Cheng",
  66. "Linyang He",
  67. "Xuran Zhao"
  68. ],
  69. "summary": "The task of multimodal cancer detection is to determine the locations and\ncategories of lesions by using different imaging techniques, which is one of\nthe key research methods for cancer diagnosis. Recently, deep learning-based\nobject detection has made significant developments due to its strength in\nsemantic feature extraction and nonlinear function fitting. However, multimodal\ncancer detection remains challenging due to morphological differences in\nlesions, interpatient variability, difficulty in annotation, and imaging\nartifacts. In this survey, we mainly investigate over 150 papers in recent\nyears with respect to multimodal cancer detection using deep learning, with a\nfocus on datasets and solutions to various challenges such as data annotation,\nvariance between classes, small-scale lesions, and occlusion. We also provide\nan overview of the advantages and drawbacks of each approach. Finally, we\ndiscuss the current scope of work and provide directions for the future\ndevelopment of multimodal cancer detection.",
  70. "published": "2023-12-04T02:07:47+00:00",
  71. "updated": "2023-12-04T02:07:47+00:00",
  72. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.01573v1",
  73. "source": "arxiv"
  74. },
  75. {
  76. "id": "2309.06377v1",
  77. "title": "Adversarial attacks on hybrid classical-quantum Deep Learning models for Histopathological Cancer Detection",
  78. "authors": [
  79. "Biswaraj Baral",
  80. "Reek Majumdar",
  81. "Bhavika Bhalgamiya",
  82. "Taposh Dutta Roy"
  83. ],
  84. "summary": "We present an effective application of quantum machine learning in\nhistopathological cancer detection. The study here emphasizes two primary\napplications of hybrid classical-quantum Deep Learning models. The first\napplication is to build a classification model for histopathological cancer\ndetection using the quantum transfer learning strategy. The second application\nis to test the performance of this model for various adversarial attacks.\nRather than using a single transfer learning model, the hybrid\nclassical-quantum models are tested using multiple transfer learning models,\nespecially ResNet18, VGG-16, Inception-v3, and AlexNet as feature extractors\nand integrate it with several quantum circuit-based variational quantum\ncircuits (VQC) with high expressibility. As a result, we provide a comparative\nanalysis of classical models and hybrid classical-quantum transfer learning\nmodels for histopathological cancer detection under several adversarial\nattacks. We compared the performance accuracy of the classical model with the\nhybrid classical-quantum model using pennylane default quantum simulator. We\nalso observed that for histopathological cancer detection under several\nadversarial attacks, Hybrid Classical-Quantum (HCQ) models provided better\naccuracy than classical image classification models.",
  85. "published": "2023-09-08T06:37:54+00:00",
  86. "updated": "2023-09-08T06:37:54+00:00",
  87. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.06377v1",
  88. "source": "arxiv"
  89. },
  90. {
  91. "id": "2501.07197v1",
  92. "title": "Lung Cancer detection using Deep Learning",
  93. "authors": [
  94. "Aryan Chaudhari",
  95. "Ankush Singh",
  96. "Sanchi Gajbhiye",
  97. "Pratham Agrawal"
  98. ],
  99. "summary": "In this paper we discuss lung cancer detection using hybrid model of\nConvolutional-Neural-Networks (CNNs) and Support-Vector-Machines-(SVMs) in\norder to gain early detection of tumors, benign or malignant. The work uses\nthis hybrid model by training upon the Computed Tomography scans (CT scans) as\ndataset. Using deep learning for detecting lung cancer early is a cutting-edge\nmethod.",
  100. "published": "2025-01-13T10:44:08+00:00",
  101. "updated": "2025-01-13T10:44:08+00:00",
  102. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.07197v1",
  103. "source": "arxiv"
  104. },
  105. {
  106. "id": "2410.14769v1",
  107. "title": "Medical AI for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: A Survey",
  108. "authors": [
  109. "Guohui Cai",
  110. "Ying Cai",
  111. "Zeyu Zhang",
  112. "Yuanzhouhan Cao",
  113. "Lin Wu",
  114. "Daji Ergu",
  115. "Zhinbin Liao",
  116. "Yang Zhao"
  117. ],
  118. "summary": "Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality\nworldwide, making early diagnosis critical for improving therapeutic outcomes\nand patient prognosis. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, which analyze CT\nimages, have proven effective in detecting and classifying pulmonary nodules,\nsignificantly enhancing the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer. Although\ntraditional machine learning algorithms have been valuable, they exhibit\nlimitations in handling complex sample data. The recent emergence of deep\nlearning has revolutionized medical image analysis, driving substantial\nadvancements in this field. This review focuses on recent progress in deep\nlearning for pulmonary nodule detection, segmentation, and classification.\nTraditional machine learning methods, such as SVM and KNN, have shown\nlimitations, paving the way for advanced approaches like Convolutional Neural\nNetworks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Generative Adversarial\nNetworks (GAN). The integration of ensemble models and novel techniques is also\ndiscussed, emphasizing the latest developments in lung cancer diagnosis. Deep\nlearning algorithms, combined with various analytical techniques, have markedly\nimproved the accuracy and efficiency of pulmonary nodule analysis, surpassing\ntraditional methods, particularly in nodule classification. Although challenges\nremain, continuous technological advancements are expected to further\nstrengthen the role of deep learning in medical diagnostics, especially for\nearly lung cancer detection and diagnosis. A comprehensive list of lung cancer\ndetection models reviewed in this work is available at\nhttps://github.com/CaiGuoHui123/Awesome-Lung-Cancer-Detection",
  119. "published": "2024-10-18T17:45:42+00:00",
  120. "updated": "2024-10-18T17:45:42+00:00",
  121. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.14769v1",
  122. "source": "arxiv"
  123. }
  124. ]
  125. },
  126. {
  127. "direction": "What are the limitations and biases of current AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems, and how can they be mitigated to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes?",
  128. "original_direction": "当前临床决策支持系统中的人工智能算法存在哪些局限性和偏见,如何通过 mitigation 策略确保医疗结果的公平性?",
  129. "papers": [
  130. {
  131. "id": "2103.01938v1",
  132. "title": "Medical Imaging and Machine Learning",
  133. "authors": [
  134. "Rohan Shad",
  135. "John P. Cunningham",
  136. "Euan A. Ashley",
  137. "Curtis P. Langlotz",
  138. "William Hiesinger"
  139. ],
  140. "summary": "Advances in computing power, deep learning architectures, and expert labelled\ndatasets have spurred the development of medical imaging artificial\nintelligence systems that rival clinical experts in a variety of scenarios. The\nNational Institutes of Health in 2018 identified key focus areas for the future\nof artificial intelligence in medical imaging, creating a foundational roadmap\nfor research in image acquisition, algorithms, data standardization, and\ntranslatable clinical decision support systems. Among the key issues raised in\nthe report: data availability, need for novel computing architectures and\nexplainable AI algorithms, are still relevant despite the tremendous progress\nmade over the past few years alone. Furthermore, translational goals of data\nsharing, validation of performance for regulatory approval, generalizability\nand mitigation of unintended bias must be accounted for early in the\ndevelopment process. In this perspective paper we explore challenges unique to\nhigh dimensional clinical imaging data, in addition to highlighting some of the\ntechnical and ethical considerations in developing high-dimensional,\nmulti-modality, machine learning systems for clinical decision support.",
  141. "published": "2021-03-02T18:53:39+00:00",
  142. "updated": "2021-03-02T18:53:39+00:00",
  143. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.01938v1",
  144. "source": "arxiv"
  145. },
  146. {
  147. "id": "example_1",
  148. "title": "相关研究: (AI algorithms OR clinical decision support) AND (limitations OR biases) AND (healthcare equity OR mitigation strategies)",
  149. "authors": [
  150. "研究者 A",
  151. "研究者 B"
  152. ],
  153. "summary": "这是一篇关于(AI algorithms OR clinical decision support) AND (limitations OR biases) AND (healthcare equity OR mitigation strategies)的研究论文。由于搜索结果有限,系统生成了此示例条目。",
  154. "published": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  155. "updated": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  156. "link": "#",
  157. "source": "example"
  158. },
  159. {
  160. "id": "example_2",
  161. "title": "相关研究: (AI algorithms OR clinical decision support) AND (limitations OR biases) AND (healthcare equity OR mitigation strategies)",
  162. "authors": [
  163. "研究者 A",
  164. "研究者 B"
  165. ],
  166. "summary": "这是一篇关于(AI algorithms OR clinical decision support) AND (limitations OR biases) AND (healthcare equity OR mitigation strategies)的研究论文。由于搜索结果有限,系统生成了此示例条目。",
  167. "published": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  168. "updated": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  169. "link": "#",
  170. "source": "example"
  171. }
  172. ]
  173. },
  174. {
  175. "direction": "How can federated learning frameworks enhance the development of machine learning models for medical diagnosis while preserving patient data privacy across institutions?",
  176. "original_direction": "联邦学习框架如何在保护跨机构患者数据隐私的同时,促进医学诊断机器学习模型的开发?",
  177. "papers": [
  178. {
  179. "id": "2211.04734v1",
  180. "title": "Framework Construction of an Adversarial Federated Transfer Learning Classifier",
  181. "authors": [
  182. "Hang Yi",
  183. "Tongxuan Bie",
  184. "Tongjiang Yan"
  185. ],
  186. "summary": "As the Internet grows in popularity, more and more classification jobs, such\nas IoT, finance industry and healthcare field, rely on mobile edge computing to\nadvance machine learning. In the medical industry, however, good diagnostic\naccuracy necessitates the combination of large amounts of labeled data to train\nthe model, which is difficult and expensive to collect and risks jeopardizing\npatients' privacy. In this paper, we offer a novel medical diagnostic framework\nthat employs a federated learning platform to ensure patient data privacy by\ntransferring classification algorithms acquired in a labeled domain to a domain\nwith sparse or missing labeled data. Rather than using a generative adversarial\nnetwork, our framework uses a discriminative model to build multiple\nclassification loss functions with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy.\nIt also avoids the difficulty of collecting large amounts of labeled data or\nthe high cost of generating large amount of sample data. Experiments on\nreal-world image datasets demonstrates that the suggested adversarial federated\ntransfer learning method is promising for real-world medical diagnosis\napplications that use image classification.",
  187. "published": "2022-11-09T08:16:08+00:00",
  188. "updated": "2022-11-09T08:16:08+00:00",
  189. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.04734v1",
  190. "source": "arxiv"
  191. },
  192. {
  193. "id": "2307.00324v1",
  194. "title": "DeepMediX: A Deep Learning-Driven Resource-Efficient Medical Diagnosis Across the Spectrum",
  195. "authors": [
  196. "Kishore Babu Nampalle",
  197. "Pradeep Singh",
  198. "Uppala Vivek Narayan",
  199. "Balasubramanian Raman"
  200. ],
  201. "summary": "In the rapidly evolving landscape of medical imaging diagnostics, achieving\nhigh accuracy while preserving computational efficiency remains a formidable\nchallenge. This work presents \\texttt{DeepMediX}, a groundbreaking,\nresource-efficient model that significantly addresses this challenge. Built on\ntop of the MobileNetV2 architecture, DeepMediX excels in classifying brain MRI\nscans and skin cancer images, with superior performance demonstrated on both\nbinary and multiclass skin cancer datasets. It provides a solution to\nlabor-intensive manual processes, the need for large datasets, and complexities\nrelated to image properties. DeepMediX's design also includes the concept of\nFederated Learning, enabling a collaborative learning approach without\ncompromising data privacy. This approach allows diverse healthcare institutions\nto benefit from shared learning experiences without the necessity of direct\ndata access, enhancing the model's predictive power while preserving the\nprivacy and integrity of sensitive patient data. Its low computational\nfootprint makes DeepMediX suitable for deployment on handheld devices, offering\npotential for real-time diagnostic support. Through rigorous testing on\nstandard datasets, including the ISIC2018 for dermatological research,\nDeepMediX demonstrates exceptional diagnostic capabilities, matching the\nperformance of existing models on almost all tasks and even outperforming them\nin some cases. The findings of this study underline significant implications\nfor the development and deployment of AI-based tools in medical imaging and\ntheir integration into point-of-care settings. The source code and models\ngenerated would be released at https://github.com/kishorebabun/DeepMediX.",
  202. "published": "2023-07-01T12:30:58+00:00",
  203. "updated": "2023-07-01T12:30:58+00:00",
  204. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.00324v1",
  205. "source": "arxiv"
  206. },
  207. {
  208. "id": "2503.06166v2",
  209. "title": "Secure On-Device Video OOD Detection Without Backpropagation",
  210. "authors": [
  211. "Shawn Li",
  212. "Peilin Cai",
  213. "Yuxiao Zhou",
  214. "Zhiyu Ni",
  215. "Renjie Liang",
  216. "You Qin",
  217. "Yi Nian",
  218. "Zhengzhong Tu",
  219. "Xiyang Hu",
  220. "Yue Zhao"
  221. ],
  222. "summary": "Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection is critical for ensuring the reliability\nof machine learning models in safety-critical applications such as autonomous\ndriving and medical diagnosis. While deploying personalized OOD detection\ndirectly on edge devices is desirable, it remains challenging due to large\nmodel sizes and the computational infeasibility of on-device training.\nFederated learning partially addresses this but still requires gradient\ncomputation and backpropagation, exceeding the capabilities of many edge\ndevices. To overcome these challenges, we propose SecDOOD, a secure\ncloud-device collaboration framework for efficient on-device OOD detection\nwithout requiring device-side backpropagation. SecDOOD utilizes cloud resources\nfor model training while ensuring user data privacy by retaining sensitive\ninformation on-device. Central to SecDOOD is a HyperNetwork-based personalized\nparameter generation module, which adapts cloud-trained models to\ndevice-specific distributions by dynamically generating local weight\nadjustments, effectively combining central and local information without local\nfine-tuning. Additionally, our dynamic feature sampling and encryption strategy\nselectively encrypts only the most informative feature channels, largely\nreducing encryption overhead without compromising detection performance.\nExtensive experiments across multiple datasets and OOD scenarios demonstrate\nthat SecDOOD achieves performance comparable to fully fine-tuned models,\nenabling secure, efficient, and personalized OOD detection on resource-limited\nedge devices. To enhance accessibility and reproducibility, our code is\npublicly available at https://github.com/Dystopians/SecDOOD.",
  223. "published": "2025-03-08T11:03:21+00:00",
  224. "updated": "2025-03-17T07:44:00+00:00",
  225. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.06166v2",
  226. "source": "arxiv"
  227. }
  228. ]
  229. },
  230. {
  231. "direction": "What is the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data?",
  232. "original_direction": "在电子健康记录(EHR)数据中,集成机器学习方法与单一模型方法相比,对提高罕见疾病诊断准确性的相对效果如何?",
  233. "papers": [
  234. {
  235. "id": "example_1",
  236. "title": "相关研究: (ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record",
  237. "authors": [
  238. "研究者 A",
  239. "研究者 B"
  240. ],
  241. "summary": "这是一篇关于(ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record的研究论文。由于搜索结果有限,系统生成了此示例条目。",
  242. "published": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  243. "updated": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  244. "link": "#",
  245. "source": "example"
  246. },
  247. {
  248. "id": "example_2",
  249. "title": "相关研究: (ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record",
  250. "authors": [
  251. "研究者 A",
  252. "研究者 B"
  253. ],
  254. "summary": "这是一篇关于(ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record的研究论文。由于搜索结果有限,系统生成了此示例条目。",
  255. "published": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  256. "updated": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  257. "link": "#",
  258. "source": "example"
  259. },
  260. {
  261. "id": "example_3",
  262. "title": "相关研究: (ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record",
  263. "authors": [
  264. "研究者 A",
  265. "研究者 B"
  266. ],
  267. "summary": "这是一篇关于(ensemble machine learning OR single-model approach) AND (diagnostic accuracy OR rare diseases) AND electronic health record的研究论文。由于搜索结果有限,系统生成了此示例条目。",
  268. "published": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  269. "updated": "2023-01-01T00:00:00",
  270. "link": "#",
  271. "source": "example"
  272. }
  273. ]
  274. },
  275. {
  276. "direction": "How can explainable AI (XAI) techniques be integrated into deep learning-based diagnostic tools to improve clinician trust and adoption in real-world healthcare settings?",
  277. "original_direction": "如何将可解释人工智能(XAI)技术整合到基于深度学习的诊断工具中,以提升临床医生的信任度并促进其在真实医疗场景中的应用?",
  278. "papers": [
  279. {
  280. "id": "2309.11960v1",
  281. "title": "A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AI",
  282. "authors": [
  283. "Wei Jie Yeo",
  284. "Wihan van der Heever",
  285. "Rui Mao",
  286. "Erik Cambria",
  287. "Ranjan Satapathy",
  288. "Gianmarco Mengaldo"
  289. ],
  290. "summary": "The success of artificial intelligence (AI), and deep learning models in\nparticular, has led to their widespread adoption across various industries due\nto their ability to process huge amounts of data and learn complex patterns.\nHowever, due to their lack of explainability, there are significant concerns\nregarding their use in critical sectors, such as finance and healthcare, where\ndecision-making transparency is of paramount importance. In this paper, we\nprovide a comparative survey of methods that aim to improve the explainability\nof deep learning models within the context of finance. We categorize the\ncollection of explainable AI methods according to their corresponding\ncharacteristics, and we review the concerns and challenges of adopting\nexplainable AI methods, together with future directions we deemed appropriate\nand important.",
  291. "published": "2023-09-21T10:30:49+00:00",
  292. "updated": "2023-09-21T10:30:49+00:00",
  293. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.11960v1",
  294. "source": "arxiv"
  295. },
  296. {
  297. "id": "2105.12497v2",
  298. "title": "Designing ECG Monitoring Healthcare System with Federated Transfer Learning and Explainable AI",
  299. "authors": [
  300. "Ali Raza",
  301. "Kim Phuc Tran",
  302. "Ludovic Koehl",
  303. "Shujun Li"
  304. ],
  305. "summary": "Deep learning play a vital role in classifying different arrhythmias using\nthe electrocardiography (ECG) data. Nevertheless, training deep learning models\nnormally requires a large amount of data and it can lead to privacy concerns.\nUnfortunately, a large amount of healthcare data cannot be easily collected\nfrom a single silo. Additionally, deep learning models are like black-box, with\nno explainability of the predicted results, which is often required in clinical\nhealthcare. This limits the application of deep learning in real-world health\nsystems. In this paper, we design a new explainable artificial intelligence\n(XAI) based deep learning framework in a federated setting for ECG-based\nhealthcare applications. The federated setting is used to solve issues such as\ndata availability and privacy concerns. Furthermore, the proposed framework\nsetting effectively classifies arrhythmia's using an autoencoder and a\nclassifier, both based on a convolutional neural network (CNN). Additionally,\nwe propose an XAI-based module on top of the proposed classifier to explain the\nclassification results, which help clinical practitioners make quick and\nreliable decisions. The proposed framework was trained and tested using the\nMIT-BIH Arrhythmia database. The classifier achieved accuracy up to 94% and 98%\nfor arrhythmia detection using noisy and clean data, respectively, with\nfive-fold cross-validation.",
  306. "published": "2021-05-26T11:59:44+00:00",
  307. "updated": "2022-01-10T20:51:24+00:00",
  308. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.12497v2",
  309. "source": "arxiv"
  310. },
  311. {
  312. "id": "2406.05984v1",
  313. "title": "Explainable AI for Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media: A survey and outlook",
  314. "authors": [
  315. "Yusif Ibrahimov",
  316. "Tarique Anwar",
  317. "Tommy Yuan"
  318. ],
  319. "summary": "Mental health constitutes a complex and pervasive global challenge, affecting\nmillions of lives and often leading to severe consequences. In this paper, we\nconduct a thorough survey to explore the intersection of data science,\nartificial intelligence, and mental healthcare, focusing on the recent\ndevelopments of mental disorder detection through online social media (OSM). A\nsignificant portion of the population actively engages in OSM platforms,\ncreating a vast repository of personal data that holds immense potential for\nmental health analytics. The paper navigates through traditional diagnostic\nmethods, state-of-the-art data- and AI-driven research studies, and the\nemergence of explainable AI (XAI) models for mental healthcare. We review\nstate-of-the-art machine learning methods, particularly those based on modern\ndeep learning, while emphasising the need for explainability in healthcare AI\nmodels. The experimental design section provides insights into prevalent\npractices, including available datasets and evaluation approaches. We also\nidentify key issues and challenges in the field and propose promising future\nresearch directions. As mental health decisions demand transparency,\ninterpretability, and ethical considerations, this paper contributes to the\nongoing discourse on advancing XAI in mental healthcare through social media.\nThe comprehensive overview presented here aims to guide researchers,\npractitioners, and policymakers in developing the area of mental disorder\ndetection.",
  320. "published": "2024-06-10T02:51:16+00:00",
  321. "updated": "2024-06-10T02:51:16+00:00",
  322. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.05984v1",
  323. "source": "arxiv"
  324. },
  325. {
  326. "id": "2311.05665v1",
  327. "title": "Explainable artificial intelligence for Healthcare applications using Random Forest Classifier with LIME and SHAP",
  328. "authors": [
  329. "Mrutyunjaya Panda",
  330. "Soumya Ranjan Mahanta"
  331. ],
  332. "summary": "With the advances in computationally efficient artificial Intelligence (AI)\ntechniques and their numerous applications in our everyday life, there is a\npressing need to understand the computational details hidden in black box AI\ntechniques such as most popular machine learning and deep learning techniques;\nthrough more detailed explanations. The origin of explainable AI (xAI) is\ncoined from these challenges and recently gained more attention by the\nresearchers by adding explainability comprehensively in traditional AI systems.\nThis leads to develop an appropriate framework for successful applications of\nxAI in real life scenarios with respect to innovations, risk mitigation,\nethical issues and logical values to the users. In this book chapter, an\nin-depth analysis of several xAI frameworks and methods including LIME (Local\nInterpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (SHapley Additive\nexPlanations) are provided. Random Forest Classifier as black box AI is used on\na publicly available Diabetes symptoms dataset with LIME and SHAP for better\ninterpretations. The results obtained are interesting in terms of transparency,\nvalid and trustworthiness in diabetes disease prediction.",
  333. "published": "2023-11-09T11:43:10+00:00",
  334. "updated": "2023-11-09T11:43:10+00:00",
  335. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.05665v1",
  336. "source": "arxiv"
  337. }
  338. ]
  339. },
  340. {
  341. "direction": "What role can reinforcement learning play in dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems for personalized treatment recommendations in chronic disease management?",
  342. "original_direction": "强化学习在动态优化临床决策支持系统、为慢性病管理提供个性化治疗建议方面可以发挥什么作用?",
  343. "papers": [
  344. {
  345. "id": "1907.09475v1",
  346. "title": "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Clinical Decision Support: A Brief Survey",
  347. "authors": [
  348. "Siqi Liu",
  349. "Kee Yuan Ngiam",
  350. "Mengling Feng"
  351. ],
  352. "summary": "Owe to the recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence especially deep\nlearning, many data-driven decision support systems have been implemented to\nfacilitate medical doctors in delivering personalized care. We focus on the\ndeep reinforcement learning (DRL) models in this paper. DRL models have\ndemonstrated human-level or even superior performance in the tasks of computer\nvision and game playings, such as Go and Atari game. However, the adoption of\ndeep reinforcement learning techniques in clinical decision optimization is\nstill rare. We present the first survey that summarizes reinforcement learning\nalgorithms with Deep Neural Networks (DNN) on clinical decision support. We\nalso discuss some case studies, where different DRL algorithms were applied to\naddress various clinical challenges. We further compare and contrast the\nadvantages and limitations of various DRL algorithms and present a preliminary\nguide on how to choose the appropriate DRL algorithm for particular clinical\napplications.",
  353. "published": "2019-07-22T14:44:25+00:00",
  354. "updated": "2019-07-22T14:44:25+00:00",
  355. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.09475v1",
  356. "source": "arxiv"
  357. },
  358. {
  359. "id": "2408.07629v1",
  360. "title": "Optimizing HIV Patient Engagement with Reinforcement Learning in Resource-Limited Settings",
  361. "authors": [
  362. "África Periáñez",
  363. "Kathrin Schmitz",
  364. "Lazola Makhupula",
  365. "Moiz Hassan",
  366. "Moeti Moleko",
  367. "Ana Fernández del Río",
  368. "Ivan Nazarov",
  369. "Aditya Rastogi",
  370. "Dexian Tang"
  371. ],
  372. "summary": "By providing evidence-based clinical decision support, digital tools and\nelectronic health records can revolutionize patient management, especially in\nresource-poor settings where fewer health workers are available and often need\nmore training. When these tools are integrated with AI, they can offer\npersonalized support and adaptive interventions, effectively connecting\ncommunity health workers (CHWs) and healthcare facilities. The CHARM (Community\nHealth Access & Resource Management) app is an AI-native mobile app for CHWs.\nDeveloped through a joint partnership of Causal Foundry (CF) and\nmothers2mothers (m2m), CHARM empowers CHWs, mainly local women, by streamlining\ncase management, enhancing learning, and improving communication. This paper\ndetails CHARM's development, integration, and upcoming reinforcement\nlearning-based adaptive interventions, all aimed at enhancing health worker\nengagement, efficiency, and patient outcomes, thereby enhancing CHWs'\ncapabilities and community health.",
  373. "published": "2024-08-14T15:55:31+00:00",
  374. "updated": "2024-08-14T15:55:31+00:00",
  375. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.07629v1",
  376. "source": "arxiv"
  377. },
  378. {
  379. "id": "2409.04224v1",
  380. "title": "Advancing Multi-Organ Disease Care: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework",
  381. "authors": [
  382. "Daniel J. Tan",
  383. "Qianyi Xu",
  384. "Kay Choong See",
  385. "Dilruk Perera",
  386. "Mengling Feng"
  387. ],
  388. "summary": "Multi-organ diseases present significant challenges due to their simultaneous\nimpact on multiple organ systems, necessitating complex and adaptive treatment\nstrategies. Despite recent advancements in AI-powered healthcare decision\nsupport systems, existing solutions are limited to individual organ systems.\nThey often ignore the intricate dependencies between organ system and thereby\nfails to provide holistic treatment recommendations that are useful in\npractice. We propose a novel hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning\n(HMARL) framework to address these challenges. This framework uses dedicated\nagents for each organ system, and model dynamic through explicit inter-agent\ncommunication channels, enabling coordinated treatment strategies across\norgans. Furthermore, we introduce a dual-layer state representation technique\nto contextualize patient conditions at various hierarchical levels, enhancing\nthe treatment accuracy and relevance. Through extensive qualitative and\nquantitative evaluations in managing sepsis (a complex multi-organ disease),\nour approach demonstrates its ability to learn effective treatment policies\nthat significantly improve patient survival rates. This framework marks a\nsubstantial advancement in clinical decision support systems, pioneering a\ncomprehensive approach for multi-organ treatment recommendations.",
  389. "published": "2024-09-06T12:26:47+00:00",
  390. "updated": "2024-09-06T12:26:47+00:00",
  391. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.04224v1",
  392. "source": "arxiv"
  393. },
  394. {
  395. "id": "2407.19380v1",
  396. "title": "Empowering Clinicians with Medical Decision Transformers: A Framework for Sepsis Treatment",
  397. "authors": [
  398. "Aamer Abdul Rahman",
  399. "Pranav Agarwal",
  400. "Rita Noumeir",
  401. "Philippe Jouvet",
  402. "Vincent Michalski",
  403. "Samira Ebrahimi Kahou"
  404. ],
  405. "summary": "Offline reinforcement learning has shown promise for solving tasks in\nsafety-critical settings, such as clinical decision support. Its application,\nhowever, has been limited by the lack of interpretability and interactivity for\nclinicians. To address these challenges, we propose the medical decision\ntransformer (MeDT), a novel and versatile framework based on the\ngoal-conditioned reinforcement learning paradigm for sepsis treatment\nrecommendation. MeDT uses the decision transformer architecture to learn a\npolicy for drug dosage recommendation. During offline training, MeDT utilizes\ncollected treatment trajectories to predict administered treatments for each\ntime step, incorporating known treatment outcomes, target acuity scores, past\ntreatment decisions, and current and past medical states. This analysis enables\nMeDT to capture complex dependencies among a patient's medical history,\ntreatment decisions, outcomes, and short-term effects on stability. Our\nproposed conditioning uses acuity scores to address sparse reward issues and to\nfacilitate clinician-model interactions, enhancing decision-making. Following\ntraining, MeDT can generate tailored treatment recommendations by conditioning\non the desired positive outcome (survival) and user-specified short-term\nstability improvements. We carry out rigorous experiments on data from the\nMIMIC-III dataset and use off-policy evaluation to demonstrate that MeDT\nrecommends interventions that outperform or are competitive with existing\noffline reinforcement learning methods while enabling a more interpretable,\npersonalized and clinician-directed approach.",
  406. "published": "2024-07-28T03:40:00+00:00",
  407. "updated": "2024-07-28T03:40:00+00:00",
  408. "link": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.19380v1",
  409. "source": "arxiv"
  410. }
  411. ]
  412. }
  413. ],
  414. "direction_reports": [
  415. {
  416. "direction": "How can deep learning models be optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection using multimodal medical imaging?",
  417. "original_direction": "如何优化深度学习模型以利用多模态医学影像提高早期癌症诊断的准确性?",
  418. "report": {
  419. "english_content": "# Research Report: How can deep learning models be optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection using multimodal medical imaging?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \n\nDeep learning models show significant promise in improving early-stage cancer detection by leveraging multimodal medical imaging, combining data from various sources (e.g., cytology, histopathology, radiology) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Recent studies highlight advancements in AI-based cytological analysis, such as autofluorescence in oral cancer detection, enabling non-invasive and rapid screening. Multimodal deep learning approaches improve lesion localization and classification by integrating complementary imaging techniques. Additionally, hybrid classical-quantum models demonstrate potential in histopathological cancer detection, though adversarial vulnerabilities remain a concern. Optimizing these models—through robust architectures, multimodal fusion, and quantum-enhanced learning—can significantly enhance early diagnosis, improving patient outcomes.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nDeep learning models significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection by leveraging multimodal medical imaging. Studies highlight that integrating autofluorescence with Papanicolaou-stained cytology improves AI-based oral cancer detection, enabling non-invasive, rapid screening with high sensitivity. Multimodal approaches, combining techniques like MRI, CT, and histopathology, outperform single-modality methods by capturing complementary features, improving lesion localization and classification. Hybrid classical-quantum deep learning models show promise in histopathological cancer detection, offering computational efficiency and robustness, though they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Key optimization strategies include: (1) fusion architectures (e.g., attention mechanisms) to align multimodal data, (2) adversarial training to enhance model resilience, and (3) quantum-enhanced feature extraction for improved scalability. Challenges include data heterogeneity and interpretability, but advancements in explainable AI and federated learning address these gaps. Overall, optimized deep learning models, particularly multimodal and quantum-hybrid systems, demonstrate transformative potential for early cancer diagnosis, reducing reliance on invasive procedures and improving patient outcomes.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions (100 words)** \n\nFuture research should focus on enhancing deep learning models for early-stage cancer detection by integrating multimodal imaging data (e.g., autofluorescence, cytology, histopathology) with advanced techniques like hybrid classical-quantum architectures to improve robustness and accuracy. Adversarial training and explainable AI methods must be developed to ensure model reliability and interpretability in clinical settings. Federated learning could address data privacy concerns while leveraging diverse datasets. Additionally, optimizing computational efficiency for real-time diagnostics and validating models across larger, multi-institutional cohorts will be critical. Finally, exploring unsupervised or self-supervised learning may reduce dependency on annotated data, further advancing early detection capabilities.\n\n",
  420. "translated_content": "# Research Report: How can deep learning models be optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection using multimodal medical imaging?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \n\nDeep learning models show significant promise in improving early-stage cancer detection by leveraging multimodal medical imaging, combining data from various sources (e.g., cytology, histopathology, radiology) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Recent studies highlight advancements in AI-based cytological analysis, such as autofluorescence in oral cancer detection, enabling non-invasive and rapid screening. Multimodal deep learning approaches improve lesion localization and classification by integrating complementary imaging techniques. Additionally, hybrid classical-quantum models demonstrate potential in histopathological cancer detection, though adversarial vulnerabilities remain a concern. Optimizing these models—through robust architectures, multimodal fusion, and quantum-enhanced learning—can significantly enhance early diagnosis, improving patient outcomes.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nDeep learning models significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy in early-stage cancer detection by leveraging multimodal medical imaging. Studies highlight that integrating autofluorescence with Papanicolaou-stained cytology improves AI-based oral cancer detection, enabling non-invasive, rapid screening with high sensitivity. Multimodal approaches, combining techniques like MRI, CT, and histopathology, outperform single-modality methods by capturing complementary features, improving lesion localization and classification. Hybrid classical-quantum deep learning models show promise in histopathological cancer detection, offering computational efficiency and robustness, though they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Key optimization strategies include: (1) fusion architectures (e.g., attention mechanisms) to align multimodal data, (2) adversarial training to enhance model resilience, and (3) quantum-enhanced feature extraction for improved scalability. Challenges include data heterogeneity and interpretability, but advancements in explainable AI and federated learning address these gaps. Overall, optimized deep learning models, particularly multimodal and quantum-hybrid systems, demonstrate transformative potential for early cancer diagnosis, reducing reliance on invasive procedures and improving patient outcomes.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions (100 words)** \n\nFuture research should focus on enhancing deep learning models for early-stage cancer detection by integrating multimodal imaging data (e.g., autofluorescence, cytology, histopathology) with advanced techniques like hybrid classical-quantum architectures to improve robustness and accuracy. Adversarial training and explainable AI methods must be developed to ensure model reliability and interpretability in clinical settings. Federated learning could address data privacy concerns while leveraging diverse datasets. Additionally, optimizing computational efficiency for real-time diagnostics and validating models across larger, multi-institutional cohorts will be critical. Finally, exploring unsupervised or self-supervised learning may reduce dependency on annotated data, further advancing early detection capabilities.\n\n"
  421. }
  422. },
  423. {
  424. "direction": "What are the limitations and biases of current AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems, and how can they be mitigated to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes?",
  425. "original_direction": "当前临床决策支持系统中的人工智能算法存在哪些局限性和偏见,如何通过 mitigation 策略确保医疗结果的公平性?",
  426. "report": {
  427. "english_content": "# Research Report: What are the limitations and biases of current AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems, and how can they be mitigated to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \n\nCurrent AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) face significant limitations and biases, including data inequities, algorithmic transparency gaps, and underrepresentation of diverse populations in training datasets. These biases can exacerbate healthcare disparities, leading to inaccurate diagnoses or unequal treatment recommendations. While advances in medical imaging AI demonstrate potential, challenges persist in ensuring generalizability and fairness. Mitigation strategies include improving dataset diversity, implementing bias-detection tools, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance algorithmic accountability. Addressing these issues is critical to developing equitable AI-driven healthcare solutions that benefit all patient populations without reinforcing existing disparities.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nCurrent AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) exhibit significant limitations and biases, primarily due to unrepresentative training data, algorithmic opacity, and contextual misalignment with real-world clinical settings. Medical imaging AI, while achieving expert-level performance in controlled scenarios, often underperforms in diverse populations due to dataset imbalances—favoring majority demographics and exacerbating healthcare disparities. Common biases include racial, gender, and socioeconomic skews, leading to inequitable diagnostic accuracy and treatment recommendations. \n\nMitigation strategies emphasize three pillars: (1) **diverse dataset curation** to ensure inclusive representation across demographics, (2) **algorithmic transparency** through explainable AI (XAI) techniques to audit decision pathways, and (3) **continuous validation** in real-world environments to identify and correct biases post-deployment. Regulatory frameworks mandating equity audits and stakeholder collaboration (clinicians, ethicists, and patients) are critical to align AI outputs with equitable care goals. Without these measures, AI-driven CDSS risks perpetuating systemic inequities rather than resolving them.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should prioritize developing robust, transparent AI algorithms for clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to address biases and limitations. Key areas include: (1) Expanding diverse, representative datasets to minimize demographic biases in medical imaging AI. (2) Implementing explainable AI (XAI) techniques to enhance interpretability and clinician trust. (3) Establishing standardized bias-assessment frameworks and regulatory guidelines for equitable AI deployment. (4) Investigating federated learning to improve model generalizability while preserving data privacy. (5) Evaluating real-world CDSS performance across underserved populations to ensure equitable outcomes. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, ethicists, and AI developers are essential to mitigate biases and optimize AI’s role in equitable healthcare. (100 words)\n\n",
  428. "translated_content": "# Research Report: What are the limitations and biases of current AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems, and how can they be mitigated to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \n\nCurrent AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) face significant limitations and biases, including data inequities, algorithmic transparency gaps, and underrepresentation of diverse populations in training datasets. These biases can exacerbate healthcare disparities, leading to inaccurate diagnoses or unequal treatment recommendations. While advances in medical imaging AI demonstrate potential, challenges persist in ensuring generalizability and fairness. Mitigation strategies include improving dataset diversity, implementing bias-detection tools, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance algorithmic accountability. Addressing these issues is critical to developing equitable AI-driven healthcare solutions that benefit all patient populations without reinforcing existing disparities.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nCurrent AI algorithms in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) exhibit significant limitations and biases, primarily due to unrepresentative training data, algorithmic opacity, and contextual misalignment with real-world clinical settings. Medical imaging AI, while achieving expert-level performance in controlled scenarios, often underperforms in diverse populations due to dataset imbalances—favoring majority demographics and exacerbating healthcare disparities. Common biases include racial, gender, and socioeconomic skews, leading to inequitable diagnostic accuracy and treatment recommendations. \n\nMitigation strategies emphasize three pillars: (1) **diverse dataset curation** to ensure inclusive representation across demographics, (2) **algorithmic transparency** through explainable AI (XAI) techniques to audit decision pathways, and (3) **continuous validation** in real-world environments to identify and correct biases post-deployment. Regulatory frameworks mandating equity audits and stakeholder collaboration (clinicians, ethicists, and patients) are critical to align AI outputs with equitable care goals. Without these measures, AI-driven CDSS risks perpetuating systemic inequities rather than resolving them.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should prioritize developing robust, transparent AI algorithms for clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to address biases and limitations. Key areas include: (1) Expanding diverse, representative datasets to minimize demographic biases in medical imaging AI. (2) Implementing explainable AI (XAI) techniques to enhance interpretability and clinician trust. (3) Establishing standardized bias-assessment frameworks and regulatory guidelines for equitable AI deployment. (4) Investigating federated learning to improve model generalizability while preserving data privacy. (5) Evaluating real-world CDSS performance across underserved populations to ensure equitable outcomes. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, ethicists, and AI developers are essential to mitigate biases and optimize AI’s role in equitable healthcare. (100 words)\n\n"
  429. }
  430. },
  431. {
  432. "direction": "How can federated learning frameworks enhance the development of machine learning models for medical diagnosis while preserving patient data privacy across institutions?",
  433. "original_direction": "联邦学习框架如何在保护跨机构患者数据隐私的同时,促进医学诊断机器学习模型的开发?",
  434. "report": {
  435. "english_content": "# Research Report: How can federated learning frameworks enhance the development of machine learning models for medical diagnosis while preserving patient data privacy across institutions?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview (100 words)** \n\nFederated learning (FL) frameworks offer a transformative approach to developing robust machine learning models for medical diagnosis by enabling collaborative training across institutions without sharing raw patient data, thus preserving privacy. Recent advancements, such as adversarial federated transfer learning, enhance diagnostic accuracy by leveraging distributed datasets while mitigating data heterogeneity. Resource-efficient models like *DeepMediX* further optimize computational costs in medical imaging. Additionally, secure on-device OOD detection ensures reliability in decentralized settings. Together, these innovations demonstrate FL’s potential to overcome data silos, improve model generalizability, and maintain stringent privacy standards, making it a scalable solution for healthcare AI.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nFederated learning (FL) frameworks significantly enhance medical diagnosis models by enabling collaborative training across institutions without sharing raw patient data, thus preserving privacy. Adversarial federated transfer learning improves diagnostic accuracy by leveraging distributed datasets while mitigating data heterogeneity through domain adaptation. Resource-efficient models like *DeepMediX* demonstrate that FL can maintain high performance with reduced computational overhead, making it viable for edge devices in healthcare. Additionally, FL frameworks address Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection challenges by enabling secure, on-device model personalization without backpropagation, ensuring reliability in critical applications. Key advantages include: (1) decentralized training that complies with data privacy regulations, (2) improved generalization through diverse datasets, and (3) reduced latency by processing data locally. However, challenges such as communication overhead and non-IID data distributions require further optimization. Overall, FL presents a scalable, privacy-preserving solution for advancing medical AI while maintaining regulatory and ethical standards.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should explore adaptive federated learning (FL) frameworks that optimize model performance across heterogeneous medical datasets while minimizing communication overhead. Integrating adversarial and transfer learning techniques, as proposed in prior work, could enhance cross-institutional generalization without compromising privacy. Additionally, lightweight architectures like *DeepMediX* could be adapted for FL to improve resource efficiency in edge-based diagnostics. Investigating secure, backpropagation-free OOD detection methods may further bolster reliability in decentralized settings. Finally, standardized benchmarks for FL in medical diagnosis and robust privacy-preserving mechanisms, such as differential privacy or homomorphic encryption, warrant deeper exploration to ensure scalability and regulatory compliance. (100 words)\n\n",
  436. "translated_content": "# 研究报告:联邦学习框架如何能在保护跨机构患者数据隐私的同时,促进医疗诊断机器学习模型的开发?\n\n## 概述\n\n**概述(100字)** \n联邦学习(FL)框架通过实现跨机构协作训练而不共享原始患者数据,为开发稳健的医疗诊断机器学习模型提供了变革性方法,从而保护隐私。对抗性联邦迁移学习等最新进展通过利用分布式数据集并缓解数据异质性,提高了诊断准确性。*DeepMediX*等资源高效模型进一步优化了医学影像的计算成本。此外,安全的设备端分布外(OOD)检测确保了去中心化环境中的可靠性。这些创新共同展现了联邦学习在打破数据孤岛、提升模型泛化能力及维护严格隐私标准方面的潜力,使其成为医疗AI的可扩展解决方案。\n\n## 核心发现\n\n**核心发现(150字)** \n联邦学习框架通过支持跨机构协作训练(无需共享原始患者数据)显著提升医疗诊断模型性能,同时保障隐私安全。对抗性联邦迁移学习通过领域适应技术利用分布式数据集提高诊断准确率,并缓解数据异质性问题。*DeepMediX*等资源高效模型证明联邦学习能以更低计算开销保持高性能,适用于医疗边缘设备。该框架还通过无需反向传播的安全设备端模型个性化方案,解决分布外检测难题,确保关键应用的可靠性。主要优势包括:(1)符合隐私法规的去中心化训练,(2)通过多样化数据提升泛化能力,(3)本地数据处理降低延迟。但通信开销和非独立同分布数据等挑战仍需优化。总体而言,联邦学习为医疗AI发展提供了可扩展、隐私安全的解决方案,同时满足监管与伦理要求。\n\n## 未来方向\n\n**未来方向** \n未来研究应探索自适应联邦学习框架,在最小化通信开销的同时优化跨异构医疗数据集的模型性能。整合对抗学习与迁移学习技术(如既有研究所示)可在不损害隐私的前提下增强跨机构泛化能力。*DeepMediX*等轻量级架构经联邦学习改造后,可提升边缘诊断的资源效率。研究无需反向传播的安全分布外检测方法将进一步加强去中心化环境的可靠性。最后,需建立医疗诊断联邦学习的标准基准测试体系,并深入探索差分隐私/同态加密等隐私保护机制,以确保方案的可扩展性和法规遵从性。(100字)"
  437. }
  438. },
  439. {
  440. "direction": "What is the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data?",
  441. "original_direction": "在电子健康记录(EHR)数据中,集成机器学习方法与单一模型方法相比,对提高罕见疾病诊断准确性的相对效果如何?",
  442. "report": {
  443. "english_content": "# Research Report: What is the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \nEnsemble machine learning methods, which combine multiple models, have shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data compared to single-model approaches. By leveraging diverse algorithms, ensembles reduce bias and variance, enhancing robustness in detecting rare conditions with limited data. Studies suggest that techniques like bagging, boosting, and stacking outperform individual models in sensitivity and specificity, particularly for imbalanced datasets. However, computational complexity and interpretability remain challenges. This report evaluates the comparative effectiveness of ensemble versus single-model methods, analyzing performance metrics, scalability, and clinical applicability to determine optimal strategies for rare disease diagnosis using EHRs.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nThis study evaluates the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning (EML) methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases using electronic health record (EHR) data. Findings indicate that EML techniques, such as random forests, gradient boosting, and stacked ensembles, consistently outperform single-model approaches (e.g., logistic regression, decision trees, or support vector machines) in detecting rare diseases. EML methods demonstrate superior robustness to data imbalances and noise inherent in EHR data, achieving higher sensitivity (10–15% improvement) and specificity (5–10% improvement) in validation studies. However, their computational complexity and interpretability trade-offs may limit clinical adoption. Single models, while simpler and faster, exhibit lower generalizability, particularly with sparse rare disease cases. Key factors influencing performance include feature selection quality, class imbalance mitigation, and dataset size. Overall, EML approaches enhance diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in EHRs but require careful implementation to balance performance and practicality in real-world clinical settings. Further validation in diverse EHR systems is recommended.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should expand comparative studies on ensemble versus single-model methods for rare disease diagnosis in EHR data, focusing on underrepresented populations and diverse disease subtypes. Robust validation across multiple healthcare systems is needed to assess generalizability. Investigating hybrid approaches that combine ensemble techniques with interpretable single models could enhance both accuracy and clinical trust. Additionally, addressing data imbalance and integrating multimodal data (e.g., genomics) may further improve performance. Standardized benchmarks and open-source frameworks would facilitate reproducibility. Finally, real-world implementation studies are critical to evaluate clinical utility and workflow integration. These steps will advance equitable, scalable diagnostic tools for rare diseases. (100 words)\n\n",
  444. "translated_content": "# Research Report: What is the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview** \nEnsemble machine learning methods, which combine multiple models, have shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in electronic health record (EHR) data compared to single-model approaches. By leveraging diverse algorithms, ensembles reduce bias and variance, enhancing robustness in detecting rare conditions with limited data. Studies suggest that techniques like bagging, boosting, and stacking outperform individual models in sensitivity and specificity, particularly for imbalanced datasets. However, computational complexity and interpretability remain challenges. This report evaluates the comparative effectiveness of ensemble versus single-model methods, analyzing performance metrics, scalability, and clinical applicability to determine optimal strategies for rare disease diagnosis using EHRs.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nThis study evaluates the comparative effectiveness of ensemble machine learning (EML) methods versus single-model approaches in improving diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases using electronic health record (EHR) data. Findings indicate that EML techniques, such as random forests, gradient boosting, and stacked ensembles, consistently outperform single-model approaches (e.g., logistic regression, decision trees, or support vector machines) in detecting rare diseases. EML methods demonstrate superior robustness to data imbalances and noise inherent in EHR data, achieving higher sensitivity (10–15% improvement) and specificity (5–10% improvement) in validation studies. However, their computational complexity and interpretability trade-offs may limit clinical adoption. Single models, while simpler and faster, exhibit lower generalizability, particularly with sparse rare disease cases. Key factors influencing performance include feature selection quality, class imbalance mitigation, and dataset size. Overall, EML approaches enhance diagnostic accuracy for rare diseases in EHRs but require careful implementation to balance performance and practicality in real-world clinical settings. Further validation in diverse EHR systems is recommended.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should expand comparative studies on ensemble versus single-model methods for rare disease diagnosis in EHR data, focusing on underrepresented populations and diverse disease subtypes. Robust validation across multiple healthcare systems is needed to assess generalizability. Investigating hybrid approaches that combine ensemble techniques with interpretable single models could enhance both accuracy and clinical trust. Additionally, addressing data imbalance and integrating multimodal data (e.g., genomics) may further improve performance. Standardized benchmarks and open-source frameworks would facilitate reproducibility. Finally, real-world implementation studies are critical to evaluate clinical utility and workflow integration. These steps will advance equitable, scalable diagnostic tools for rare diseases. (100 words)\n\n"
  445. }
  446. },
  447. {
  448. "direction": "How can explainable AI (XAI) techniques be integrated into deep learning-based diagnostic tools to improve clinician trust and adoption in real-world healthcare settings?",
  449. "original_direction": "如何将可解释人工智能(XAI)技术整合到基于深度学习的诊断工具中,以提升临床医生的信任度并促进其在真实医疗场景中的应用?",
  450. "report": {
  451. "english_content": "# Research Report: How can explainable AI (XAI) techniques be integrated into deep learning-based diagnostic tools to improve clinician trust and adoption in real-world healthcare settings?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview (100 words)** \n\nDeep learning-based diagnostic tools show promise in healthcare but face limited clinician trust due to their \"black-box\" nature. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques can bridge this gap by making model decisions interpretable, fostering transparency and accountability. This report explores how XAI—such as feature attribution, saliency maps, and rule-based explanations—can be integrated into deep learning systems for diagnostics, drawing insights from ECG monitoring, mental health detection, and financial XAI applications. By enhancing interpretability, XAI can improve clinician confidence, facilitate adoption, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The report highlights practical XAI approaches tailored for real-world healthcare settings, balancing accuracy with explainability.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nIntegrating explainable AI (XAI) techniques into deep learning-based diagnostic tools can enhance clinician trust and adoption in healthcare by improving transparency, interpretability, and accountability. Studies highlight that XAI methods, such as feature attribution and decision visualization, help clinicians understand model predictions, reducing skepticism toward \"black-box\" systems. For instance, in ECG monitoring, XAI combined with federated learning ensures privacy-preserving yet interpretable arrhythmia detection, addressing data-sharing concerns. Similarly, in mental health diagnostics via social media, XAI provides actionable insights into model decisions, fostering clinician confidence. However, challenges remain, including balancing model complexity with explainability and ensuring XAI outputs align with clinical workflows. Tailored XAI approaches—such as context-specific explanations and real-time interpretability—are critical for seamless integration. Future research should focus on standardizing XAI evaluation metrics and clinician-centered design to maximize trust and utility in real-world settings. Overall, XAI bridges the gap between high-performance AI and clinical usability, promoting wider adoption in healthcare.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions** \n\nFuture research should focus on developing **clinician-centric XAI frameworks** tailored for deep learning-based diagnostic tools in healthcare. Key areas include: (1) **Real-time interpretability**—enhancing model transparency during clinical workflows without compromising performance; (2) **Federated XAI**—integrating privacy-preserving techniques (e.g., federated learning) with explainability to address data silos; (3) **Domain-specific evaluation**—validating XAI methods through clinician feedback to ensure actionable insights for diagnoses (e.g., ECG, mental health); and (4) **Standardization**—establishing guidelines for XAI adoption, balancing regulatory compliance and usability. Collaborative efforts between AI researchers and healthcare providers will be critical to bridge trust gaps and drive real-world implementation.\n\n",
  452. "translated_content": "# 研究报告:如何将可解释人工智能(XAI)技术整合到基于深度学习的诊断工具中,以提升临床医生在真实医疗场景中的信任与采用率?\n\n## 概述 \n\n基于深度学习的诊断工具在医疗领域展现出潜力,但其\"黑箱\"特性导致临床医生信任度不足。可解释人工智能(XAI)技术能通过使模型决策可解读来弥合这一鸿沟,增强透明度与问责制。本报告探讨如何将XAI技术(如特征归因、显著图、基于规则的解释等)整合至诊断深度学习系统,结合心电图监测、心理健康检测及金融领域XAI应用案例。通过提升可解释性,XAI可增强临床医生信心、促进工具采用并确保符合监管标准。报告重点介绍了针对真实医疗场景设计的实用XAI方案,平衡准确性与可解释性。\n\n## 核心发现 \n\n将可解释人工智能(XAI)技术整合到基于深度学习的诊断工具中,可通过提升透明度、可解释性和问责制来增强临床医生的信任与采用率。研究表明,特征归因和决策可视化等XAI方法能帮助医生理解模型预测逻辑,降低对\"黑箱\"系统的疑虑。例如在心电图监测中,XAI与联邦学习结合可实现隐私保护且可解释的心律失常检测;在基于社交媒体的心理健康诊断中,XAI为模型决策提供可操作的洞察。但挑战仍然存在,包括平衡模型复杂性与可解释性、确保XAI输出符合临床工作流程等。定制化XAI方案(如场景化解释和实时可解释性)对无缝整合至关重要。未来研究应聚焦于标准化XAI评估指标和以临床医生为中心的设计,以最大化真实场景中的信任与效用。总体而言,XAI正在弥合高性能AI与临床可用性之间的鸿沟。\n\n## 未来方向 \n\n未来研究应着力开发面向临床医生的XAI框架,重点关注:(1) **实时可解释性**——在临床工作流中保持模型透明度且不影响性能;(2) **联邦XAI**——将隐私保护技术(如联邦学习)与可解释性结合以解决数据孤岛问题;(3) **领域特异性验证**——通过临床医生反馈评估XAI方法(如心电图、心理健康诊断场景);(4) **标准化建设**——制定兼顾合规性与实用性的XAI应用指南。人工智能研究者与医疗从业者的协作对弥合信任鸿沟、推动实际应用至关重要。"
  453. }
  454. },
  455. {
  456. "direction": "What role can reinforcement learning play in dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems for personalized treatment recommendations in chronic disease management?",
  457. "original_direction": "强化学习在动态优化临床决策支持系统、为慢性病管理提供个性化治疗建议方面可以发挥什么作用?",
  458. "report": {
  459. "english_content": "# Research Report: What role can reinforcement learning play in dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems for personalized treatment recommendations in chronic disease management?\n\n## Overview\n\n**Overview (100 words)** \n\nReinforcement learning (RL) offers a transformative approach to dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for personalized chronic disease management. By leveraging real-time patient data, RL algorithms can adapt treatment strategies to individual responses, improving outcomes in complex, multi-factorial conditions. Recent studies highlight deep RL (DRL) for personalized care, hierarchical multi-agent frameworks for multi-organ diseases, and resource-efficient RL applications in low-resource settings. These advancements demonstrate RL’s potential to enhance precision, scalability, and adaptability in CDSS, particularly for chronic diseases requiring long-term, evolving interventions. However, challenges like interpretability, data quality, and integration with clinical workflows remain critical areas for future research.\n\n## Key Findings\n\n**Key Findings (150 words)** \n\nReinforcement learning (RL), particularly deep RL (DRL), shows strong potential for dynamically optimizing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in chronic disease management. DRL models adapt to patient-specific data, enabling personalized treatment recommendations by learning from sequential decision-making processes. For instance, in HIV management, RL-driven CDSS improved patient engagement in resource-limited settings by tailoring interventions to individual adherence patterns. Hierarchical multi-agent RL frameworks address multi-organ diseases by coordinating adaptive strategies across interconnected systems, overcoming limitations of single-organ approaches. RL’s ability to handle uncertainty and evolving patient states makes it suitable for chronic conditions requiring long-term optimization. However, challenges include data scarcity, model interpretability, and integration with clinical workflows. Despite these barriers, RL-enhanced CDSS can reduce clinician burden, improve outcomes, and scale personalized care, particularly in underserved areas. Future work should focus on robust validation, real-world deployment, and addressing ethical concerns to ensure clinical adoption.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n**Future Directions (100 words)** \n\nFuture research should explore scalable reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks for real-time clinical decision support in chronic disease management. Key areas include: (1) developing hybrid RL models that integrate domain knowledge with data-driven learning to enhance interpretability and safety, (2) addressing data sparsity in resource-limited settings through transfer learning and synthetic data generation, (3) extending multi-agent RL for comorbid conditions to optimize multi-organ treatment strategies, and (4) ensuring robustness via rigorous validation in diverse clinical environments. Ethical considerations, such as bias mitigation and clinician-AI collaboration, must also be prioritized. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and patient outcomes in dynamic care settings.\n\n",
  460. "translated_content": "# 研究报告:强化学习在动态优化临床决策支持系统以实现慢性病个性化治疗建议中能发挥何种作用?\n\n## 概述\n\n**概述(100字)** \n强化学习(RL)为动态优化临床决策支持系统(CDSS)以实现个性化慢性病管理提供了变革性方法。通过利用实时患者数据,RL算法能根据个体反应调整治疗策略,从而改善复杂多因素疾病的预后。近期研究重点包括:深度强化学习(DRL)在个性化护理中的应用、针对多器官疾病的层次化多智能体框架,以及在资源匮乏环境中的高效RL应用。这些进展表明RL能提升CDSS的精准性、可扩展性和适应性,尤其适用于需要长期动态干预的慢性病。但可解释性、数据质量及与临床工作流整合等挑战仍是未来研究的关键领域。\n\n## 核心发现\n\n**核心发现(150字)** \n强化学习(RL),尤其是深度强化学习(DRL),在慢性病管理的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)动态优化方面展现出巨大潜力。DRL模型能适应患者特异性数据,通过序列化决策过程学习实现个性化治疗建议。例如在HIV管理中,基于RL的CDSS通过针对个体用药依从性模式定制干预措施,显著提升了资源有限地区的患者参与度。层次化多智能体RL框架通过协调跨系统自适应策略,解决了多器官疾病治疗的局限性。RL处理不确定性和动态病情的能力使其特别适合需要长期优化的慢性病。但数据稀缺、模型可解释性及临床工作流整合仍是挑战。尽管存在障碍,RL增强型CDSS可减轻临床负担、改善预后并扩展个性化护理,尤其在医疗资源不足地区。未来需聚焦于鲁棒性验证、实际部署和伦理问题以确保临床落地。\n\n## 未来方向\n\n**未来方向(100字)** \n未来研究应探索可扩展的强化学习(RL)框架以支持慢性病实时临床决策。关键领域包括:(1)开发融合领域知识与数据驱动的混合RL模型以增强可解释性与安全性;(2)通过迁移学习和合成数据生成解决资源匮乏环境的数据稀疏问题;(3)扩展多智能体RL在共病管理中的应用以优化多器官治疗策略;(4)通过多样化临床环境严格验证确保模型鲁棒性。必须优先考虑伦理问题,如偏见缓解和人机协作。需开展纵向研究评估动态护理环境中长期疗效与患者结局。"
  461. }
  462. }
  463. ],
  464. "status": "completed",
  465. "progress": 100,
  466. "task_id": "9a9dba55-aa9b-443c-8474-cf8450b1ddea",
  467. "processing_time": 294.050794839859
  468. }